|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued |
|---|
|
Posted by: evil
|
Sep,07.2009-19:51
|
This is perhaps a bad idea (I'm crappy at electronics and signal integrity etc), but how about an extension cable of good quality from the first add-on-card (say EtherNat) and placing the second card (SuperVidel) behind the CT60 (or other suitable place).
Or is it crucial to have them stuck on top of eachother ?
--
Anders Eriksson
ae@dhs.nu
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox
|
Sep,06.2009-22:57
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
sqward
|
Sep,06.2009-23:51
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox & instream
|
Sep,08.2009-20:56
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
sqward
|
Sep,09.2009-11:50
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
quackmore
|
Sep,09.2009-17:48
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
mikro
|
Jan,11.2024-21:54
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
evil
|
Sep,07.2009-19:51
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox & instream
|
Sep,08.2009-20:23
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
mikro
|
Sep,08.2009-18:48
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox & instream
|
Sep,08.2009-20:27
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
Jake/Depression
|
Sep,08.2009-19:36
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
raphael
|
Sep,08.2009-23:09
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
quackmore
|
Sep,09.2009-02:17
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
instream
|
Sep,09.2009-08:32
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
rian_ata
|
Sep,09.2009-15:05
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
rian_ata
|
Sep,09.2009-15:05
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
quackmore
|
Sep,09.2009-17:45
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
instream
|
Sep,10.2009-10:47
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
