|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued |
|---|
|
Posted by: sqward
|
Sep,06.2009-23:51
|
Well, for some one like me, who don't have Ethernat (a working one I mean) it would be ideal to have SV+Ethernat functionality in one device. I guess we could skip USB, and FPGA logic could provide DMA transfer for ethernet chip. This is my ideal solution :)
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox
|
Sep,06.2009-22:57
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
sqward
|
Sep,06.2009-23:51
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox & instream
|
Sep,08.2009-20:56
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
sqward
|
Sep,09.2009-11:50
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
quackmore
|
Sep,09.2009-17:48
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
mikro
|
Jan,11.2024-21:54
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
evil
|
Sep,07.2009-19:51
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox & instream
|
Sep,08.2009-20:23
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
mikro
|
Sep,08.2009-18:48
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
hencox & instream
|
Sep,08.2009-20:27
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
Jake/Depression
|
Sep,08.2009-19:36
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
raphael
|
Sep,08.2009-23:09
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
quackmore
|
Sep,09.2009-02:17
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
instream
|
Sep,09.2009-08:32
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
rian_ata
|
Sep,09.2009-15:05
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
rian_ata
|
Sep,09.2009-15:05
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
quackmore
|
Sep,09.2009-17:45
|
|
Re: CT60+SV+EtherNat continued
|
instream
|
Sep,10.2009-10:47
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
