|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: CL2/CL3 |
|---|
|
Posted by: Ragstaff
|
Nov,11.2003-08:00
|
>CL2 is better than CL3
But isn't CL relative to the actual speed of the RAM? So CL3 on PC1000 ram (if it existed :-) would be much better than PC133 CL2
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
100 MHz.. nearly.
|
evil
|
Nov,08.2003-16:02
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Anonymous
|
Nov,08.2003-16:26
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
evil
|
Nov,08.2003-18:37
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Didier Méquignon
|
Nov,09.2003-12:48
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
evil
|
Nov,09.2003-17:07
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Philipp Donzé
|
Nov,09.2003-18:29
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
hencox
|
Nov,10.2003-10:02
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
hencox
|
Nov,10.2003-10:04
|
|
Re: CL2/CL3
|
Ragstaff
|
Nov,11.2003-08:00
|
|
Re: CL2/CL3
|
hencox
|
Nov,11.2003-11:12
|
|
Re: CL2/CL3
|
stimpy
|
Nov,14.2003-14:03
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Peter
|
Nov,10.2003-16:19
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
evil
|
Nov,10.2003-20:25
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Peter
|
Nov,11.2003-09:56
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
SWE
|
Nov,11.2003-21:40
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Didier Méquignon
|
Nov,11.2003-22:04
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Thomas / New Beat
|
Nov,12.2003-12:25
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
SWE
|
Nov,12.2003-21:00
|
|
Re: 100 MHz.. nearly.
|
Didier Méquignon
|
Nov,14.2003-22:00
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
