|
|
Atari coding BBS
| Re: DSP sign extend question |
|---|
|
Posted by: Thomas / New Beat
|
Dec,11.2013-09:29
|
A bit late but just to mention...
In a receive loop, you could optimize the conversion to 1 instruction if you only need 0xABCD signed to 0xABCD00, or two instructions if you need 0xABCD signed low to 0xFFABCD.
In either way, it would be fast enough for the DSP to handle while the CPU moves data to the host port I think.
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
DSP sign extend question
|
Thadoss
|
Oct,30.2013-01:28
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
mikro
|
Oct,30.2013-11:43
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
Thadoss
|
Oct,30.2013-12:37
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
mikro
|
Oct,30.2013-14:09
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
ggn
|
Oct,30.2013-14:55
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
ggn
|
Oct,30.2013-16:03
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
Thadoss
|
Oct,30.2013-17:43
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
Thomas / New Beat
|
Nov,07.2013-08:59
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
Thomas / New Beat
|
Dec,11.2013-09:29
|
|
Re: DSP sign extend question
|
Thomas / New Beat
|
Dec,12.2013-20:14
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
