 |
|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: Supervidel? |
|---|
|
Posted by: neurotics
|
May,10.2005-14:43
|
>The project was started last summer. >What did you expect?
Actually I do not expect anything. If there will be an EtherNAT some day it will be fine.
I just wanted to be realistic about getting a SuperVidel this year or even next year (remember the name of this thread?).
>Give the boys some support/credit >instead, offer them pre-payment or >whatever. This could make them more >confident and inspire them to work >harder.
I already ordered an EtherNAT. And they can be sure that I am going to buy it whenever it hits the light of the day. I also did a pre-payment for my CT60 and I am going to do this for the EtherNAT as well if necessary.
>The software part is done, the
Sorry to tell you but the software part is far from beeing complete. As far as I know ethernet (with Mint-Net) is running fine but USB is only tested with some test routines. Nothing more nothing less (e.g. STING and full USB support is still missing).
>hardware design itself is done, bugs
Come on. Having a daughterboard for USB means a redesign of the hardware which indirectly results in additional testing and debugging.
Apart from that I still want to say that I appreciate all the work that is done in this project and I am totally looking forward to replace my etherNEC with an etherNAT instead.
So, carry on, Nature! :-)
-- neurotics --
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
Supervidel?
|
Zorro
|
May,02.2005-17:10
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Anonymous
|
May,02.2005-17:19
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Zorro
|
May,02.2005-23:09
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Instream
|
May,03.2005-13:50
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
vulgar
|
May,03.2005-19:33
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
krupkaj
|
May,03.2005-23:50
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
neurotics
|
May,04.2005-16:04
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
gwEm
|
May,04.2005-16:54
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Peter
|
May,04.2005-17:49
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
neurotics
|
May,06.2005-10:33
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Peter
|
May,06.2005-13:07
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
neurotics
|
May,10.2005-14:43
|
|
EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Peter
|
May,10.2005-16:28
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Instream
|
May,10.2005-18:50
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Crash
|
May,11.2005-00:11
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Instream
|
May,11.2005-15:49
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Crash
|
May,12.2005-02:36
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Coda
|
May,12.2005-09:51
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Coda
|
May,12.2005-09:53
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
gwEm
|
May,12.2005-12:41
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Coda
|
May,13.2005-01:52
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Instream
|
May,16.2005-15:29
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Instream
|
May,16.2005-16:00
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
neurotics
|
May,13.2005-10:51
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Goli
|
May,15.2005-23:37
|
|
Re: EtherNat (was:Supervidel)
|
Goli
|
May,15.2005-23:58
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
earx
|
May,02.2005-18:15
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Zorro
|
May,02.2005-23:07
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Creature XL
|
May,06.2005-22:09
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Peter
|
May,02.2005-22:03
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Zorro
|
May,02.2005-23:22
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
PeP
|
May,03.2005-10:22
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Uli
|
May,03.2005-11:42
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
mikro
|
May,03.2005-14:32
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
cruzito
|
May,04.2005-02:23
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Crash
|
May,05.2005-01:33
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
samf
|
May,05.2005-16:01
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Ozk
|
May,09.2005-09:22
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
samf
|
May,09.2005-15:46
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
raphael
|
May,09.2005-21:20
|
|
Re: Supervidel?
|
Zorro
|
May,11.2005-04:51
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
|
|
