|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: Bus acceleration without 06 |
|---|
|
Posted by: Peter
|
Feb,16.2005-14:24
|
I think Didier is right.
Two jumpers, one for the bus accelleration, and one to enable the CPU accellerator.
I can verify this if you like. Why would you want to use a CT60 purely as a bus accellerator? Have I missed something?
-- Peter
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
Bus acceleration without 060?
|
MacFalcon
|
Feb,15.2005-15:03
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 060?
|
Peter
|
Feb,15.2005-17:13
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 06
|
MacFalcon
|
Feb,15.2005-21:13
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 0
|
Didier Méquignon
|
Feb,15.2005-21:36
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 06
|
Peter
|
Feb,16.2005-14:24
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 06
|
vlg@o2.pl
|
Feb,16.2005-16:37
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 06
|
MacFalcon
|
Feb,16.2005-21:24
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 06
|
Anonymous
|
Feb,18.2005-17:41
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 06
|
Rodolphe
|
Feb,18.2005-23:59
|
|
Re: Bus acceleration without 0
|
MacFalcon
|
Feb,22.2005-12:17
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
