|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire |
|---|
|
Posted by: Beetle
|
May,18.2010-00:29
|
Since ct6x uses SDRAM at full CPU clock and not PS/2 RAM at half or third the CPU clock, i'd range it higher than a Pentium 1 class system. Perhaps a PII system with 100 MHz core clock.
And of course FF is dog slow, because it burns giant amounts of RAM.
Iron (webkit and GTK2 dependecies accepted) needs much less with almost same experience - only much faster.
Ever gave Iron a try? On my Netbook FF3.5 needs 10 seconds to just start up, Iron pops up in two.
I'd happily wait 15 seconds on a Falcon if i can have a modern browsing experience.
It would be cool if Highwire can be improved to support more modern stuff.
I'd even pay for that. If a port of another "small" (i know thats relative) browser is less work - i'd support that way as well.
I just think a decent browser is very much important for any OS today.
And its worth to check out the possibilities. Again, too bad i can't code.
Greets,
Beetle
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
mac-falcon
|
May,17.2010-15:18
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
Beetle
|
May,17.2010-17:12
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
mikro
|
May,17.2010-21:04
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
Beetle
|
May,17.2010-22:33
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
mikro
|
May,17.2010-23:32
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
sqward
|
May,17.2010-23:39
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
Paolo
|
May,19.2010-00:40
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
mac-falcon
|
May,19.2010-14:38
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
sqward
|
May,17.2010-23:38
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
Beetle
|
May,18.2010-00:29
|
|
Re: CT60, Radeon 9250 - Highwire
|
mac-falcon
|
May,18.2010-10:50
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
