|
|
Atari coding BBS
| Re: 68881 and demoscene |
|---|
|
Posted by: Cyprian
|
May,01.2012-11:30
|
my question was due to comparison 68030 vs FPU timing, which showed that that 030 is a bit faster that fpu e.g:
muls.w d0, d1 - 44 cycles
fmul - 80 cycles (best case)
divs.l d0, d1 - 90 cycles
fdiv - 124 cycles (best case)
as far as I remember correctly fpu needs to do conversion integer <-> floating point - additional 60 or 100 cycles
so where is the catch? :)
I try to prepare small production for TT (maybe 3D, bump mapping, phong shading), and I wonder whether or not to use FPU
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
Apr,29.2012-02:40
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
mikro
|
Apr,29.2012-11:30
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
nativ
|
Apr,30.2012-14:14
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
evil
|
Apr,30.2012-15:24
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,02.2012-01:49
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,02.2012-11:29
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
nativ
|
May,02.2012-13:00
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
evil
|
May,02.2012-13:46
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,02.2012-15:59
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,02.2012-15:58
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
nativ
|
May,02.2012-19:38
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,02.2012-20:17
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
ggn
|
May,04.2012-08:05
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,01.2012-11:30
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
evil
|
May,01.2012-11:33
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
Cyprian
|
May,02.2012-01:49
|
|
Re: 68881 and demoscene
|
deez
|
May,04.2012-11:07
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
