|
CT60 and related things BBS
Re: ST emulator |
Posted by: earx
|
May,29.2008-10:51
|
true, it's a misconception. for instance, a ct60 will execute an emulated (via exception) MOVEP instruction slower than a standard ST! other instructions might work very fast, though. when you don't need cycle-accurate emulation it should be fine.
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
ST emulator
|
quackmore
|
May,26.2008-05:52
|
Re: ST emulator
|
MacFalcon
|
May,26.2008-09:20
|
Re: ST emulator
|
earx
|
May,26.2008-10:03
|
Re: ST emulator
|
PeP
|
May,26.2008-10:10
|
Re: ST emulator
|
Carbon
|
May,26.2008-21:33
|
Re: ST emulator
|
Peter
|
May,27.2008-08:54
|
Re: ST emulator
|
quackmore
|
May,29.2008-09:42
|
Re: ST emulator
|
Peter
|
May,29.2008-10:29
|
Re: ST emulator
|
earx
|
May,29.2008-10:51
|
Re: ST emulator
|
evil
|
May,29.2008-15:15
|
Re: ST emulator
|
mikro
|
May,29.2008-20:26
|
Re: ST emulator
|
earx
|
May,30.2008-11:45
|
Re: ST emulator
|
raphael
|
May,30.2008-12:34
|
Re: ST emulator
|
Peter
|
May,30.2008-12:44
|
Re: ST emulator
|
MacFalcon
|
May,31.2008-10:24
|
Re: ST emulator
|
PeterS
|
Jun,05.2008-16:20
|
What's the anti-troll code? That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|