|
|
CT60 and related things BBS
| Re: Best Packer for CT60? |
|---|
|
Posted by: evil
|
Nov,28.2004-00:19
|
Yes, the OS loads/mallocs as how the flags on the file are. An execpacker doesn't work like an archiver, so there is no new file after depack. All is done in memory after execution.
--
Anders Eriksson
ae@dhs.nu
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
Best Packer for CT60?
|
CiH
|
Nov,26.2004-15:10
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
SWE
|
Nov,26.2004-17:06
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
Coda
|
Nov,26.2004-17:34
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
deez
|
Nov,26.2004-18:49
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
evil
|
Nov,26.2004-19:03
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
evil
|
Nov,26.2004-19:01
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
CiH
|
Nov,26.2004-20:20
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
mikro
|
Dec,03.2004-11:50
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
polish_sucker
|
Jan,14.2005-07:55
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
SWE
|
Nov,27.2004-13:47
|
|
Re: Best Packer for CT60?
|
evil
|
Nov,28.2004-00:19
|
What's the anti-troll code?
That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|
