|
|
Atari demoscene BBS
| Re: DMA DSP don't help that mu |
|
Posted by: earx
|
Jul,07.2004-19:07
|
what about the chipram rates of te 1200? those are lower than the falcon's. and 020 @14 was pathetic compared to 030@16 with 56001@32. and then no bpp mode. that's why the 1200 needed a 50MHz 030 to get where the falcon was standard.
a lot of amiga fans ranted about the bad design of the 1200 and even told that it should have been more like the falcon!
i wonder where you get this mis-information? don't piss me off anymore or i will start to go czuba-mode!
|
[All messages in this thread] [Start new thread]
|
Topic
|
Posted by
|
Date
|
|
DSP Doom question.
|
EvilFranky
|
Jul,05.2004-21:35
|
|
Re: DSP Doom question.
|
earx
|
Jul,05.2004-21:49
|
|
Re: DSP Doom question.
|
The biggest bottleneck is
|
Jul,06.2004-08:59
|
|
Re: DSP Doom question.
|
mikro
|
Jul,06.2004-12:43
|
|
Re: DSP Doom question.
|
EvilFranky
|
Jul,06.2004-21:27
|
|
DMA DSP don't help that much
|
Kochise
|
Jul,07.2004-09:55
|
|
Re: DMA DSP don't help that much
|
mikro
|
Jul,07.2004-12:06
|
|
Re: DMA DSP don't help that much
|
tewn
|
Jul,07.2004-12:11
|
|
Re: DMA DSP don't help that mu
|
earx
|
Jul,07.2004-19:07
|
|
Re: DSP Doom question.
|
earx
|
Jul,07.2004-19:03
|
|
Re: DSP Doom question.
|
EvilFranky
|
Jul,08.2004-06:09
|
What's the anti-troll code? That's your personal code to be able to add comments and messages on the dhs.nu site.
Don't have a code or forgot it? Fix it here.
|